National and International Issues

Implications of Emerging Hypersonic Missile Race

India tested the High-Speed Technology Demonstrator Vehicle (HSTDV) using an indigenously developed propulsion system on September 7, 2020. It, thus, became the fourth country to develop such technology besides U.S., Russia and China. It is important to look into this advanced missile technology to determine what are the characteristics of these weapons and what they mean for nuclear deterrence. Would these weapons fuel yet more arms races regionally and globally? And most important of all, what does India’s development of hypersonic missiles mean for Pakistan as well as regional and global security.
Overall, hypersonic missiles have a number of characteristics. They can achieve great speed. In order to qualify as hypersonic a missile has to achieve at least speed five times that of sound of Mach 5. That is 4000 miles per hour. There are weapons that can travel for up to 20 Mach. Hypersonic missiles are highly maneuverable and can have long ranges. Due to high speed and maneuverability they can penetrate missile defense systems. What makes hypersonic missiles lethal is not just their speed but their ability to maneuver once launched. U.S. and Russia have had hypersonic missiles for years but those could not be maneuvered once launched. What is new is the ability for these missiles to change course after the initial launch as well. There are three kinds of hypersonic missiles – the guided ballistic missile, boost-glide missiles and hypersonic cruise missiles. The boost glide missiles use an existing Intercontinental Ballistic Missile for launch on a normal ballistic trajectory, and are then launched and glide to the target. Hypersonic cruise missiles use supersonic combustion ramjet or turboramjet engine for propulsion. This is more maneuverable and can travel at a lower altitude.
Russia is developing the Avangard intercontinental ballistic missile system which uses a hypersonic boost-glide vehicle, with the ability to travel at speed 20 times that of sound. Russia also has Kinzhal which is a guided cruise missile with a range of 1200 km and a speed of Mach 10. It is capable of carrying nuclear and conventional warheads. Russia announced deployment of Avangard on December 2019. Russia is also developing Tsirkon, which a ship-launched hypersonic cruise missile capable of targeting on ground and at sea at speeds of Mach 6-8. Russia accelerated work on its hypersonic missiles once the U.S. withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missiles Treaty and ignored Russian concerns over the deployment of missile defense systems.
China also has several hypersonic missiles. China has DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle that can be deployed on top of DF-17 with a speed of Mach 10. China unveiled its DF-17 hypersonic missile on its National Day Parade in October 2019. It is also developing air-launched CH-AS-X-13 missile with Mach 10 speed and a 1500 km range. In August 2018, China also tested Starry Sky-2 which is a hypersonic vehicle prototype capable of carrying nuclear warheads. China’s pursuit of hypersonic missiles is also fueled by fear of U.S. hypersonic missiles that can potentially conduct a first strike while U.S. missile defenses could defeat a retaliatory strike by China. 
The U.S. has also developed a number of hypersonic missiles. It has several hypersonic missiles which are mostly meant for conventional use. The U.S. Navy has Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS), the Army has Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) and the Air Force has AGM-183 Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW). It also has the Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) and the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) and the HyRAX unmanned craft projects. The U.S. claims that these weapons are aimed at neutralizing Russian and Chinese significant hypersonic missile developments. Thus, a hypersonic missile race is already well on its way.
India has now joined the race to develop hypersonic missile technology. It first unsuccessfully tested HSTDV in June 2019. However, the September 2020 test was reportedly a success. It was powered by a scramjet engine and has a speed of Mach 6.  DRDO is also working on a hypersonic cruise missile BrahMos-II with the help of Russia.  It is also expected to attain Mach 6 speed using hypersonic scramjet technology. Although India may be five to six years away from developing hypersonic missiles, this development has a number of implications at the regional and global level.
The race to develop and master hypersonic missiles is destabilizing in many ways. It is not only destabilizing at the global level but also at the regional level now that India is also pursuing this technology. This new arms race would change nuclear deterrence calculations. A country that has hypersonic missiles would enjoy an edge over a country that does not. It would increase first strike tendencies in the possessor state with the confidence that it can strike its adversary and absorb a counter strike through missile defense. This scenario would be relevant in the case of India and Pakistan whereby it could impact nuclear deterrence between the two and create first strike temptations on the part of New Delhi. With short missile flight times in South Asia i.e., 5-10 minutes, hypersonic missiles would further shorten this time considerably, making the India-Pakistan nuclear theatre even more unstable. Hypersonic missiles are likely to provide India considerable edge in the South Asian nuclear deterrence equation. It will, thus, create new challenges for Pakistan’s security.
At the hypersonic level, it would likely be a matter of a minute or two for India to initiate the first strike in the absence of a credible countermeasure. These geographical circumstances would likely provide India an edge vis-à-vis Pakistan, thus becoming a considerable challenge. 
Hypersonic missiles blur the line between conventional and strategic weapons. Whether a hypersonic missile is armed with nuclear or conventional warhead would create further ambiguity. This would increase the chances of misperception and increase the likelihood of a nuclear exchange. This is extremely risky in the South Asian nuclear environment. 
The hypersonic missiles development is also destabilizing at the global level. This will also affect strategic calculations among the great powers like U.S., Russia and China and undermine nuclear deterrence. Russia and China have already made it apparent that their hypersonic missile development is a bulwark against U.S. missile defenses. Both Moscow and Beijing have time and again protested against U.S. missile defense deployments in Europe and East Asia. They have expressed concerns that U.S. missile defense deployments affect nuclear deterrence. While the U.S. has maintained that their deployments are aimed against countries like Iran and North Korea. However, U.S. missile defense capabilities can be used against China and Russia. Thus, both countries have invested in hypersonic weapons. Russia clearly stated that its Avangard was meant to counter U.S. missile defense deployments. Russia has already announced the deployment of Avangard missile in December 2019. 
The technology would further fuel an arms race leading great powers to possibly go for development of hypersonic anti-missile systems and other technologies to defeat adversaries’ missiles. Another destabilizing factor is the deployment of conventional hypersonic missiles which may lead to the failure of the adversary to distinguish between a conventional or nuclear warhead. This may lead to unauthorized or accidental nuclear launch. 
Another source of concern is that the development and race to field hypersonic missiles comes at a time when international arms control architecture is crumbling. The U.S. withdrew from the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) that maintained strategic restraint with Russia for over 30 years, New START that limits the number of deployed strategic weapons by U.S. and Russia is about to expire in February 2021. U.S. withdrew from the Open Skies Treaty that allowed member states to conduct unarmed, observation flights over each other’s territory. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty has been weakened. The Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) had been dead for nearly two decades now. The weakened arms control architecture has been accompanied by military and nuclear modernization and now a hypersonic missile race. `
A hypersonic missile race is already on its way. States leading in this race are U.S., Russia, China and now India. These missiles would further deepen an arms race and bring instability at the global and regional level. Development of hypersonic missiles by India further undermines regional nuclear deterrence and increases the chances of conflict in South Asia. Hypersonic missiles would further enhance India’s offensive counterforce capabilities. For Pakistan, this necessitates an assessment of the threat from India and possible countermeasures. At the global level as well, the move away from arms control arrangement and the onset of a new arms race bodes ill for peace and security. Great powers also need to take practical measures to avoid arms races because accumulation of weapons and new technologies by all major powers ends up making them less secure.


The writer is a Research Fellow at the Institute of Strategic Studies, Islamabad and focuses on nuclear and arms control & disarmament issues.
E-mail: [email protected]
 

Read 177 times


TOP